In quantum mechanics, a Fock state or number state is a quantum state that is an element of a Fock space with a well-defined number of particles (or quantum). These states are named after the Soviet Union physicist Vladimir Fock. Fock states play an important role in the second quantization formulation of quantum mechanics.
The particle representation was first treated in detail by Paul Dirac for and by Pascual Jordan and Eugene Wigner for . The Fock states of bosons and fermions obey useful relations with respect to the Fock space creation and annihilation operators.
If the number of particles is variable, one constructs the Fock space as the direct sum of the tensor product Hilbert spaces for each particle number. In the Fock space, it is possible to specify the same state in a new notation, the occupancy number notation, by specifying the number of particles in each possible one-particle state.
Let be an orthonormal basis of states in the underlying one-particle Hilbert space. This induces a corresponding basis of the Fock space called the "occupancy number basis". A quantum state in the Fock space is called a Fock state if it is an element of the occupancy number basis.
A Fock state satisfies an important criterion: for each i, the state is an eigenstate of the particle number operator corresponding to the i-th elementary state ki. The corresponding eigenvalue gives the number of particles in the state. This criterion nearly defines the Fock states (one must in addition select a phase factor).
A given Fock state is denoted by . In this expression, denotes the number of particles in the i-th state ki, and the particle number operator for the i-th state, , acts on the Fock state in the following way:
Hence the Fock state is an eigenstate of the number operator with eigenvalue .
Fock states often form the most convenient basis of a Fock space. Elements of a Fock space that are superpositions of states of differing particle number (and thus not eigenstates of the number operator) are not Fock states. For this reason, not all elements of a Fock space are referred to as "Fock states".
If we define the aggregate particle number operator as
the definition of Fock state ensures that the variance of measurement , i.e., measuring the number of particles in a Fock state always returns a definite value with no fluctuation.
\left|\left\langle f\left|\widehat{\mathbb{O}}\right|1_{\mathbf{k}_1}, 1_{\mathbf{k}_2}\right\rangle\right|^2 = \left|\left\langle f\left|\widehat{\mathbb{O}}\right|1_{\mathbf{k}_2}, 1_{\mathbf{k}_1}\right\rangle\right|^2.
So, we must have
where for bosons and for fermions. Since and are arbitrary, we can say,
Note that the number operator does not distinguish bosons from fermions; indeed, it just counts particles without regard to their symmetry type. To perceive any difference between them, we need other operators, namely the creation and annihilation operators.
| n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1, \dots \right\rangle \\[6pt] \left(\left\langle n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l}, \dots \left| b_{\mathbf{k}_l} \right| n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1, \dots \right\rangle\right)^* &= \left\langle n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1 \dots \left| b_{\mathbf{k}_l}^\dagger \right| n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l}, \dots \right\rangle \\ &= \sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_l} + 1}\left\langle n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1 \dots | n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} + 1 \dots \right\rangle\end{align}
Therefore, it is clear that adjoint of creation (annihilation) operator doesn't go into itself. Hence, they are not Hermitian operators.
But adjoint of creation (annihilation) operator is annihilation (creation) operator.
>0,0,0...\rangle |
, ,... |
, ,... |
>n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}},...\rangle |
and, . That is, the l-th creation operator creates a particle in the l-th state kl, and the vacuum state is a fixed point of annihilation operators as there are no particles to annihilate. | We can generate any Fock state by operating on the vacuum state with an appropriate number of creation operators:
\frac{\left(b^\dagger_{\mathbf{k}_1}\right)^{n_{\mathbf{k}_1}}}{\sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_1}!}} \frac{\left(b^\dagger_{\mathbf{k}_2}\right)^{n_{\mathbf{k}_2}}}{\sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_2}!}}...|0_{\mathbf{k}_{1}}, 0_{\mathbf{k}_{2}}, ...\rangle| For a single mode Fock state, expressed as, ,
Number operators are Hermitian operators.
Using the commutation relation we have,
b_{\mathbf{k}_m}^\dagger.b_{\mathbf{k}_l} \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, .... n_{\mathbf{k}_m} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ... \right\rangle &= b_{\mathbf{k}_l}.b_{\mathbf{k}_m}^\dagger \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, .... n_{\mathbf{k}_m} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ... \right\rangle\\
&= \sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_m} + 1}\sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_l}} \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, .... n_{\mathbf{k}_{m}} + 1 ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1 ...\right\rangle\end{align}
So, the Bosonic Fock state behaves to be symmetric under operation by Exchange operator.
These two actions are done antisymmetrically, which we shall discuss later.
\left\{c^{\,}_i, c^\dagger_j\right\} \equiv c^{\,}_i c^\dagger_j + c^\dagger_jc^{\,}_i &= \delta_{ij}, \\ \left\{c^\dagger_i, c^\dagger_j\right\} = \left\{c^{\,}_i, c^{\,}_j\right\} &= 0,\end{align}
where is the commutator and is the Kronecker delta. These anticommutation relations can be used to show antisymmetric behaviour of Fermionic Fock states.
\left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ...\right\rangle = S_-\left|i_1, i_2, i_3 ... i_l ...\right\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N!}}\begin{vmatrix} \left|i_1\right\rangle_1 & \cdots & \left|i_1\right\rangle_N \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \left|i_N\right\rangle_1 & \cdots & \left|i_N\right\rangle_N\end{vmatrix}
This determinant is called the Slater determinant. If any of the single particle states are the same, two rows of the Slater determinant would be the same and hence the determinant would be zero. Hence, two identical must not occupy the same state (a statement of the Pauli exclusion principle). Therefore, the occupation number of any single state is either 0 or 1. The eigenvalue associated to the fermionic Fock state must be either 0 or 1.
>0,0,0...\rangle |
, ,... |
, ... |
... |
Using the anticommutation relation we have
c_{\mathbf{k}_m}^{\dagger}.c_{\mathbf{k}_l} \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, .... n_{\mathbf{k}_m} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ... \right\rangle = \sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_m} + 1}\sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_l}} \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, .... n_{\mathbf{k}_m} + 1 ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1 ...\right\rangle
but,
Thus, fermionic Fock states are antisymmetric under operation by particle exchange operators.
The total Hamiltonian is given by
\mathcal{H} &= \int d^3 x\,\mathfrak{H} = \int d^{3}x \psi^{*}(x)\left(-\frac{\nabla^2}{2m}\right)\psi(x) \\ \therefore \mathfrak{H} &= -\frac{\nabla^2}{2m}\end{align}
and
and
where is the annihilation operator.
Only for non-interacting particles do and commute; in general they do not commute. For non-interacting particles,
\sum_{n,n'}\int d^3 x\, a^{\dagger}_{n'}\psi_{n'}^{(+)^{*}}(x)\, E^{0}_{n}\psi_{n}^{(+)}(x)a_n = \sum_{n,n'}E^{0}_{n} a^{\dagger}_{n'}a_n\delta_{nn'} = \sum_{n}E^{0}_{n}a^{\dagger}_n a_n = \sum_{n}E^{0}_{n}\widehat{N}
If they do not commute, the Hamiltonian will not have the above expression. Therefore, in general, Fock states are not energy eigenstates of a system.
The electric and magnetic fields and the vector potential have the mode expansion of the same general form:
The expectation values of these field operators vanish in the vacuum state:
However, the expectation values of the square of these field operators are non-zero: there are field fluctuations in the vacuum state. These vacuum fluctuations are responsible for many interesting phenomena including the Lamb shift in quantum optics.
\left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}\right\rangle \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_2}\right\rangle \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_3}\right\rangle \ldots \equiv \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3}... n_{\mathbf{k}_l}... \right\rangle \equiv \left|\{n_\mathbf{k}\}\right\rangle
The creation and annihilation operators operate on the multi-mode state by only raising or lowering the number state of their own mode:
a__l} |n__{1}}, n__{2}}, n__{3}}... n__{l}}, ...\rangle &= \sqrt{n__{l}}} |n__{1}}, n__{2}}, n__{3}}... n__{l}}-1, ...\rangle \\ a^{\dagger}__l} |n__{1}}, n__{2}}, n__{3}}... n__{l}},...\rangle &= \sqrt{n__{l}} +1 } |n__{1}}, n__{2}}, n__{3}}... n__{l}} + 1, ...\rangle\end{align}
We also define the total number operator for the field which is a sum of number operators of each mode:
The multi-mode Fock state is an eigenvector of the total number operator whose eigenvalue is the total occupation number of all the modes
In case of non-interacting particles, number operator and Hamiltonian commute with each other and hence multi-mode Fock states become eigenstates of the multi-mode Hamiltonian
''Phys. Rev. Lett.'' '''85''' (2) 290--293, [http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.290 doi 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.290][[Quantum dot]]C. Santori, M. Pelton, G. Solomon, Y. Dale and Y. Yamamoto (2001), "Triggered Single Photons from a Quantum Dot", ''Phys. Rev. Lett.'' '''86''' (8):1502--1505 [http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1502 DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1502] ). However, these sources are not always very efficient, often presenting a low probability of actually getting a single photon on demand; and often complex and unsuitable out of a laboratory environment.
Other sources are commonly used that overcome these issues at the expense of a nondeterministic behavior. Heralded single photon sources are probabilistic two-photon sources from whom the pair is split and the detection of one photon heralds the presence of the remaining one. These sources usually rely on the optical non-linearity of some materials like periodically poled Lithium niobate (Spontaneous parametric down-conversion), or silicon (spontaneous Four-wave mixing) for example.
|
|