Product Code Database
Example Keywords: jeans -hair $41
   » » Wiki: Fock State
Tag Wiki 'Fock State'.
Tag

In quantum mechanics, a Fock state or number state is a that is an element of a with a well-defined number of particles (or ). These states are named after the physicist . Fock states play an important role in the second quantization formulation of quantum mechanics.

The particle representation was first treated in detail by for and by and for . The Fock states of bosons and fermions obey useful relations with respect to the Fock space creation and annihilation operators.


Definition
One specifies a multiparticle state of N non-interacting identical particles by writing the state as a sum of tensor products of N one-particle states. Additionally, depending on the integrality of the particles' spin, the tensor products must be alternating (anti-symmetric) or of the underlying one-particle . Specifically:

  • , having half-integer spin and obeying the Pauli exclusion principle, correspond to antisymmetric tensor products.
  • , possessing integer spin (and not governed by the exclusion principle) correspond to symmetric tensor products.

If the number of particles is variable, one constructs the as the direct sum of the tensor product Hilbert spaces for each . In the Fock space, it is possible to specify the same state in a new notation, the occupancy number notation, by specifying the number of particles in each possible one-particle state.

Let \left\{\mathbf{k}_{i}\right\}_{i \in I} be an orthonormal basis of states in the underlying one-particle Hilbert space. This induces a corresponding basis of the Fock space called the "occupancy number basis". A quantum state in the Fock space is called a Fock state if it is an element of the occupancy number basis.

A Fock state satisfies an important criterion: for each i, the state is an eigenstate of the particle number operator \widehat{N__i}} corresponding to the i-th elementary state ki. The corresponding eigenvalue gives the number of particles in the state. This criterion nearly defines the Fock states (one must in addition select a phase factor).

A given Fock state is denoted by |n__1},n__2},..n__i}...\rangle. In this expression, n__i} denotes the number of particles in the i-th state ki, and the particle number operator for the i-th state, \widehat{N__i}}, acts on the Fock state in the following way:

\widehat{N__i}}|n__1},n__2},..n__i}...\rangle = n__i}|n__1},n__2},..n__i}...\rangle

Hence the Fock state is an eigenstate of the number operator with eigenvalue n__i}.

(1995). 9780521417112, Cambridge University Press.

Fock states often form the most convenient basis of a Fock space. Elements of a Fock space that are superpositions of states of differing (and thus not eigenstates of the number operator) are not Fock states. For this reason, not all elements of a Fock space are referred to as "Fock states".

If we define the aggregate particle number operator \widehat{N} as

\widehat{N} = \sum_i \widehat{N__i}},

the definition of Fock state ensures that the of measurement \operatorname{Var}\left(\widehat{N}\right) = 0, i.e., measuring the number of particles in a Fock state always returns a definite value with no fluctuation.


Example using two particles
For any final state |f\rangle, any Fock state of two identical particles given by |1_, 1_\rangle, and any operator \widehat{\mathbb{O}} , we have the following condition for indistinguishability:
(1999). 9780471353867, Wiley-VCH.
 \left|\left\langle f\left|\widehat{\mathbb{O}}\right|1_{\mathbf{k}_1}, 1_{\mathbf{k}_2}\right\rangle\right|^2 =
 \left|\left\langle f\left|\widehat{\mathbb{O}}\right|1_{\mathbf{k}_2}, 1_{\mathbf{k}_1}\right\rangle\right|^2
     
.

So, we must have \left\langle f\left|\widehat{\mathbb{O}}\right|1_, 1_\right\rangle = e^{i\delta}\left\langle f\left|\widehat{\mathbb{O}}\right|1_, 1_\right\rangle

where e^{i\delta} = +1 for and -1 for . Since \langle f| and \widehat{\mathbb{O}} are arbitrary, we can say,

\left|1_{\mathbf{k}_1}, 1_{\mathbf{k}_2}\right\rangle = +\left|1_{\mathbf{k}_2}, 1_{\mathbf{k}_1}\right\rangle for bosons and
\left|1_{\mathbf{k}_1}, 1_{\mathbf{k}_2}\right\rangle = -\left|1_{\mathbf{k}_2}, 1_{\mathbf{k}_1}\right\rangle for fermions.

Note that the number operator does not distinguish bosons from fermions; indeed, it just counts particles without regard to their symmetry type. To perceive any difference between them, we need other operators, namely the creation and annihilation operators.


Bosonic Fock state
, which are particles with integer spin, follow a simple rule: their composite eigenstate is symmetric under operation by an exchange operator. For example, in a two particle system in the tensor product representation we have \hat{P}\left|x_1, x_2\right\rangle = \left|x_2, x_1\right\rangle .


Boson creation and annihilation operators
We should be able to express the same symmetric property in this new Fock space representation. For this we introduce non-Hermitian bosonic creation and annihilation operators, denoted by b^{\dagger} and b respectively. The action of these operators on a Fock state are given by the following two equations:

  • Creation operator b^{\dagger}__l} :
  • : b^{\dagger}__l}|n__{1}}, n__{2}},n__{3}}...n__{l}},...\rangle=\sqrt{n__{l}} +1 } |n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}}+1 ,...\rangle
  • Annihilation operator b__l} :
  • : b__l}|n__{1}}, n__{2}},n__{3}}...n__{l}},...\rangle=\sqrt{n__{l}}} |n__{1}}, n__{2}}, n__{3}}...n__{l}}-1 ,...\rangle


Non-Hermiticity of creation and annihilation operators
The bosonic Fock state creation and annihilation operators are not Hermitian operators. \left\langle n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1, \dots
      | n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1, \dots \right\rangle \\[6pt]
    \left(\left\langle n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l}, \dots
      \left| b_{\mathbf{k}_l} \right|
      n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1, \dots \right\rangle\right)^*
 &= \left\langle n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1 \dots
    \left| b_{\mathbf{k}_l}^\dagger \right|
      n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l}, \dots \right\rangle \\
 &= \sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_l} + 1}\left\langle n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1 \dots
     | n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} \dots n_{\mathbf{k}_l} + 1 \dots \right\rangle
     
\end{align}

Therefore, it is clear that adjoint of creation (annihilation) operator doesn't go into itself. Hence, they are not Hermitian operators.

But adjoint of creation (annihilation) operator is annihilation (creation) operator.

(2025). 9780521769754, Cambridge University Press. .


Operator identities
The commutation relations of creation and annihilation operators in a are
\leftb^{\,}_i, \equiv b^{\,}_i b^\dagger_j - b^\dagger_jb^{\,}_i = \delta_{i j},
\leftb^\dagger_i, = \leftb^{\,}_i, = 0,
where \ is the and \delta_{i j} is the .


N bosonic basis states
>0,0,0...\rangle
, >0,0,1...\rangle,...
, >0,2,0...\rangle,...
>n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}},...\rangle


Action on some specific Fock states
, 0__{2}}, 0__{3}}...0__{l}}, ...\rangle, we have:
b^{\dagger}__l}|0__{1}}, 0__{2}}, 0__{3}}...0__{l}}, ...\rangle = |0__{1}}, 0__{2}}, 0__{3}}...1__{l}}, ...\rangle

and, b_{\mathbf{k}_l}|0_{\mathbf{k}_1}, 0_{\mathbf{k}_2}, 0_{\mathbf{k}_3}...0_{\mathbf{k}_l}, ...\rangle = 0. That is, the l-th creation operator creates a particle in the l-th state kl, and the vacuum state is a fixed point of annihilation operators as there are no particles to annihilate. | We can generate any Fock state by operating on the vacuum state with an appropriate number of creation operators:

|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2} ...\rangle =
 \frac{\left(b^\dagger_{\mathbf{k}_1}\right)^{n_{\mathbf{k}_1}}}{\sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_1}!}}
 \frac{\left(b^\dagger_{\mathbf{k}_2}\right)^{n_{\mathbf{k}_2}}}{\sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_2}!}}...|0_{\mathbf{k}_{1}}, 0_{\mathbf{k}_{2}}, ...\rangle
     
| For a single mode Fock state, expressed as, |n_\mathbf{k}\rangle,
b^\dagger_\mathbf{k}|n_\mathbf{k}\rangle = \sqrt{n_\mathbf{k} + 1} |n_\mathbf{k} + 1\rangle and,
b_\mathbf{k}|n_\mathbf{k}\rangle = \sqrt{n_\mathbf{k}} |n_\mathbf{k} - 1\rangle


Action of number operators
The number operators \widehat{N__l}} for a bosonic system are given by \widehat{N__l}}=b^{\dagger}__l}b__l}, where \widehat{N__l}}|n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}}...\rangle=n__{l}} |n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}}...\rangle

Number operators are Hermitian operators.


Symmetric behaviour of bosonic Fock states
The commutation relations of the creation and annihilation operators ensure that the bosonic Fock states have the appropriate symmetric behaviour under particle exchange. Here, exchange of particles between two states (say, l and m) is done by annihilating a particle in state l and creating one in state m. If we start with a Fock state |\psi\rangle = \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2} , .... n_{\mathbf{k}_m} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ... \right\rangle, and want to shift a particle from state k_l to state k_m, then we operate the Fock state by b_{\mathbf{k}_m}^\dagger b_{\mathbf{k}_l} in the following way:

Using the commutation relation we have, b_{\mathbf{k}_m}^\dagger.b_{\mathbf{k}_l} = b_{\mathbf{k}_l}.b_{\mathbf{k}_m}^\dagger

\begin{align}
 b_{\mathbf{k}_m}^\dagger.b_{\mathbf{k}_l} \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, .... n_{\mathbf{k}_m} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ... \right\rangle
   &= b_{\mathbf{k}_l}.b_{\mathbf{k}_m}^\dagger \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, .... n_{\mathbf{k}_m} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ... \right\rangle
     
\\
   &= \sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_m} + 1}\sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_l}} \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, .... n_{\mathbf{k}_{m}} + 1 ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1 ...\right\rangle
     
\end{align}

So, the Bosonic Fock state behaves to be symmetric under operation by Exchange operator.

Wignerfunction fock 0.png|Wigner function of |0\rangle Wignerfunction fock 1.png|Wigner function of |1\rangle Wignerfunction fock 2.png|Wigner function of |2\rangle Wignerfunction fock 3.png|Wigner function of |3\rangle Wignerfunction fock 4.png|Wigner function of |4\rangle


Fermionic Fock state

Fermion creation and annihilation operators
To be able to retain the antisymmetric behaviour of , for Fermionic Fock states we introduce non-Hermitian fermion creation and annihilation operators, defined for a Fermionic Fock state |\psi\rangle = |n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}},...\rangle as:

  • The creation operator c^{\dagger}__l} acts as:
  • : c^{\dagger}__l}|n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}},...\rangle=\sqrt{n__{l}} +1 } |n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}}+1 ,...\rangle
  • The annihilation operator c__l} acts as:
  • : c__l}|n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}},...\rangle=\sqrt{n__{l}}} |n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}}-1 ,...\rangle

These two actions are done antisymmetrically, which we shall discuss later.


Operator identities
The anticommutation relations of creation and annihilation operators in a are,
\begin{align}
 \left\{c^{\,}_i, c^\dagger_j\right\} \equiv c^{\,}_i c^\dagger_j + c^\dagger_jc^{\,}_i &= \delta_{ij}, \\
            \left\{c^\dagger_i, c^\dagger_j\right\} = \left\{c^{\,}_i, c^{\,}_j\right\} &= 0,
     
\end{align}

where {\{ \ , \ \} } is the and \delta_{i j} is the . These anticommutation relations can be used to show antisymmetric behaviour of Fermionic Fock states.


Action of number operators
Number operators \widehat{N__l}} for are given by \widehat{N__l}}=c^{\dagger}__l}.c__l}.
\widehat{N__l}}|n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}}...\rangle=n__{l}} |n__{1}}, n__{2}} ,n__{3}}...n__{l}}...\rangle


Maximum occupation number
The action of the number operator as well as the creation and annihilation operators might seem same as the bosonic ones, but the real twist comes from the maximum occupation number of each state in the fermionic Fock state. Extending the 2-particle fermionic example above, we first must convince ourselves that a fermionic Fock state |\psi\rangle = \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ... \right\rangle is obtained by applying a certain sum of permutation operators to the tensor product of eigenkets as follows:
 \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ...\right\rangle =
 S_-\left|i_1, i_2, i_3 ... i_l ...\right\rangle =
 \frac{1}{\sqrt{N!}}\begin{vmatrix}
   \left|i_1\right\rangle_1 & \cdots & \left|i_1\right\rangle_N \\
                     \vdots & \ddots &                   \vdots \\
   \left|i_N\right\rangle_1 & \cdots & \left|i_N\right\rangle_N
     
\end{vmatrix}
(2025). 9783540850618, Springer.

This determinant is called the Slater determinant. If any of the single particle states are the same, two rows of the Slater determinant would be the same and hence the determinant would be zero. Hence, two identical must not occupy the same state (a statement of the Pauli exclusion principle). Therefore, the occupation number of any single state is either 0 or 1. The eigenvalue associated to the fermionic Fock state \widehat{N__l}} must be either 0 or 1.


N fermionic basis states \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l}, ...\right\rangle
>0,0,0...\rangle
, >0,0,1...\rangle,...
, >1,0,1,0...\rangle...
...


Action on some specific Fock states

Antisymmetric behaviour of Fermionic Fock state
Antisymmetric behaviour of Fermionic states under Exchange operator is taken care of by the anticommutation relations. Here, exchange of particles between two states is done by annihilating one particle in one state and creating one in other. If we start with a Fock state |\psi\rangle = \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, ... n_{\mathbf{k}_m}... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ...\right\rangle and want to shift a particle from state k_l to state k_m, then we operate the Fock state by c_{\mathbf{k}_m}^{\dagger}.c_{\mathbf{k}_l} in the following way:

Using the anticommutation relation we have

c_{\mathbf{k}_m}^\dagger.c_{\mathbf{k}_l} = -c_{\mathbf{k}_l}.c_{\mathbf{k}_m}^\dagger
 c_{\mathbf{k}_m}^{\dagger}.c_{\mathbf{k}_l} \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, .... n_{\mathbf{k}_m} ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} ... \right\rangle =
 \sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_m} + 1}\sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k}_l}} \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, .... n_{\mathbf{k}_m} + 1 ... n_{\mathbf{k}_l} - 1 ...\right\rangle
     

but, \begin{align}

      &c__{l}}.c__{m}}^{\dagger}|n__{1}}, n__{2}}, ....n__{m}}... n__{l}}...\rangle \\
 ={} -&c__{m}}^{\dagger}.c__{l}}|n__{1}}, n__{2}}, .... n__{m}}... n__{l}}...\rangle \\
 ={} -&\sqrt{n__{m}} +1 }\sqrt{n__{l}}}|n__{1}}, n__{2}}, .... n__{m}} + 1 ... n__{l}} - 1...\rangle
     
\end{align}

Thus, fermionic Fock states are antisymmetric under operation by particle exchange operators.


Fock states are not energy eigenstates in general
In second quantization theory, the Hamiltonian density function is given by
\mathfrak{H} = \frac{1}{2m} \nabla_{i}\psi^{*}(x)\, \nabla_{i}\psi(x)

The total Hamiltonian is given by

\begin{align}
             \mathcal{H} &= \int d^3 x\,\mathfrak{H}
                          = \int d^{3}x \psi^{*}(x)\left(-\frac{\nabla^2}{2m}\right)\psi(x) \\
 \therefore \mathfrak{H} &= -\frac{\nabla^2}{2m}
     
\end{align}

In free Schrödinger theory,

\mathfrak{H}\psi_{n}^{(+)}(x) = -\frac{\nabla^2}{2m}\psi_{n}^{(+)}(x) = E_{n}^{0}\psi_{n}^{(+)}(x)

and

\int d^3 x\, \psi_{n}^{(+)^{*}}(x)\, \psi_{n'}^{(+)}(x) = \delta_{nn'}

and

\psi(x) = \sum_n a_n \psi_{n}^{(+)}(x),

where a_n is the annihilation operator.

\therefore \mathcal{H} = \sum_{n,n'}\int d^{3}x\, a^{\dagger}_{n'}\psi_{n'}^{(+)^{*}}(x)\, \mathfrak{H}a_n \psi_{n}^{(+)}(x)

Only for non-interacting particles do \mathfrak{H} and a_n commute; in general they do not commute. For non-interacting particles,

\mathcal{H} =
 \sum_{n,n'}\int d^3 x\, a^{\dagger}_{n'}\psi_{n'}^{(+)^{*}}(x)\, E^{0}_{n}\psi_{n}^{(+)}(x)a_n =
 \sum_{n,n'}E^{0}_{n} a^{\dagger}_{n'}a_n\delta_{nn'} =
 \sum_{n}E^{0}_{n}a^{\dagger}_n a_n =
 \sum_{n}E^{0}_{n}\widehat{N}
     

If they do not commute, the Hamiltonian will not have the above expression. Therefore, in general, Fock states are not energy eigenstates of a system.


Vacuum fluctuations
The vacuum state or |0\rangle is the state of the lowest energy and the expectation values of a and a^\dagger vanish in this state:

\langle 0 | a|0\rangle = \langle 0 |a^\dagger|0\rangle = 0

The electric and magnetic fields and the vector potential have the mode expansion of the same general form:

F\left(\vec{r}, t\right) = \varepsilon a e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r} - \omega t} + \varepsilon a^\dagger e^{-i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r} - \omega t}

The expectation values of these field operators vanish in the vacuum state:

\langle 0|F|0 \rangle = 0

However, the expectation values of the square of these field operators are non-zero: there are field fluctuations in the vacuum state. These vacuum fluctuations are responsible for many interesting phenomena including the in quantum optics.


Multi-mode Fock states
In a multi-mode field each creation and annihilation operator operates on its own mode. So a_{\mathbf{k}_l} and a^{\dagger}_{\mathbf{k}_l} will operate only on \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_l}\right\rangle. Since operators corresponding to different modes operate in different sub-spaces of the Hilbert space, the entire field is a direct product of |n_{\mathbf{k}_l}\rangle over all the modes:

 \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}\right\rangle \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_2}\right\rangle \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_3}\right\rangle \ldots \equiv
 \left|n_{\mathbf{k}_1}, n_{\mathbf{k}_2}, n_{\mathbf{k}_3}... n_{\mathbf{k}_l}... \right\rangle \equiv
 \left|\{n_\mathbf{k}\}\right\rangle
     

The creation and annihilation operators operate on the multi-mode state by only raising or lowering the number state of their own mode:

\begin{align}
 a__l} |n__{1}}, n__{2}}, n__{3}}... n__{l}}, ...\rangle &=
 \sqrt{n__{l}}} |n__{1}}, n__{2}}, n__{3}}... n__{l}}-1, ...\rangle \\
 a^{\dagger}__l} |n__{1}}, n__{2}}, n__{3}}... n__{l}},...\rangle &=
 \sqrt{n__{l}} +1 } |n__{1}}, n__{2}}, n__{3}}... n__{l}} + 1, ...\rangle
     
\end{align}

We also define the total for the field which is a sum of number operators of each mode:

\hat{n}_{\mathbf{k}} = \sum \hat{n}_{\mathbf{k}_l}

The multi-mode Fock state is an eigenvector of the total number operator whose eigenvalue is the total occupation number of all the modes

\hat{n}_{\mathbf{k}} |\{n_{\mathbf{k}}\}\rangle = \left( \sum n_{\mathbf{k}_l} \right) |\{n_{\mathbf{k}}\}\rangle

In case of non-interacting particles, number operator and Hamiltonian commute with each other and hence multi-mode Fock states become eigenstates of the multi-mode Hamiltonian

\hat{H} \left|\{n_{\mathbf{k}}\}\right\rangle = \left( \sum \hbar \omega \left(n_{\mathbf{k}_l} + \frac{1}{2} \right)\right) \left|\{n_{\mathbf{k}}\}\right\rangle


Source of single photon state
Single photons are routinely generated using single emitters (atoms, ions, molecules, Nitrogen-vacancy center,C. Kurtsiefer, S. Mayer, P. Zarda, Patrick and H. Weinfurter, (2000), "Stable Solid-State Source of Single Photons",
 ''Phys. Rev. Lett.'' '''85''' (2) 290--293, [http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.290    doi 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.290] [[Quantum dot]]C. Santori, M. Pelton, G. Solomon, Y. Dale and Y. Yamamoto (2001), "Triggered Single Photons from a Quantum Dot", ''Phys. Rev. Lett.'' '''86''' (8):1502--1505 [http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1502 DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1502]
     
). However, these sources are not always very efficient, often presenting a low probability of actually getting a single photon on demand; and often complex and unsuitable out of a laboratory environment.

Other sources are commonly used that overcome these issues at the expense of a nondeterministic behavior. Heralded single photon sources are probabilistic two-photon sources from whom the pair is split and the detection of one photon heralds the presence of the remaining one. These sources usually rely on the optical non-linearity of some materials like periodically poled (Spontaneous parametric down-conversion), or silicon (spontaneous ) for example.


Non-classical behaviour
The Glauber–Sudarshan P-representation of Fock states shows that these states are purely quantum mechanical and have no classical counterpart. The \scriptstyle\varphi(\alpha) \, of these states in the representation is a 2n'th derivative of the Dirac delta function and therefore not a classical probability distribution.


See also


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs